Contact details
-
Restricted Area
eManual
1. Schematic outline
2. transparency and information provision
Introduction
Recommendation
Examples
Sources
Articles
3. Accreditation and Quality Assurance
Introduction
Recommendation
Information
Examples
Sources
Networks
Articles
4. Authenticity
Introduction
Recommendation
Examples
Sources
Articles
5. Purpose of Recognition
Introduction
Recommendation
Examples
Articles
6. Diploma Supplement
Introduction
Recommendation
Examples
Sources
Articles
7. Qualifications Frameworks
Introduction
Recommendation
Examples
Sources
Articles
8. Credits
Introduction
Recommendation
Examples
Sources
Articles
9. Learning Outcomes
Introduction
Recommendation
Examples
Sources
Articles
10. Substantial Differences
Introduction
Recommendation
Examples
Sources
Articles
11. Alternative recognition
Introduction
Recommendation
Examples
Sources
Articles
12. Refugees
Introduction
Recommendation
Examples
Sources
Articles
13. Non-Traditional Learning
Introduction
Recommendation
Examples
Sources
Articles
14. Transnational education
Introduction
Recommendation
Examples
Sources
Articles
15. Joint programmes
Introduction
Recommendation
Examples
Sources
Articles
16. Non-Recognised Institutions
Introduction
Recommendation
Examples
Sources
Articles
17. Diploma and Accreditation Mills
Introduction
Recommendation
Examples
Tools
Articles
18. Sources
19. Glossary
SUBSTANTIAL DIFFERENCES
RELEVANT ARTICLES RCP
Qualifications of approximately equal level may show differences in terms of content, profile and learning outcomes. In the assessment of foreign qualifications, these differences should be considered in a flexible way, and only substantial differences in view of the purpose for which recognition is sought (e.g. academic or de facto professional recognition) should lead to partial recognition or non-recognition of the foreign qualifications.
Recognition of foreign qualifications should be granted unless a substantial difference can be demonstrated between the qualification for which recognition is requested and the relevant qualification of the State in which recognition is sought. In applying this principle, the assessment should seek to establish whether:
the differences in learning outcomes between the foreign qualification and the relevant qualification of the country in which recognition is sought are too substantial to allow the recognition of the foreign qualification as requested by the applicant. If so, the assessment should seek to establish whether alternative, partial and/or conditional recognition may be granted;
the differences in access to further activities (such as further study, research activities, the exercise of gainful employment) between the foreign qualification and the relevant qualification of the country in which recognition is sought are too substantial to allow the recognition of the foreign qualification as requested by the applicant. If so, the assessment should seek to establish whether alternative, partial and/or conditional recognition may be granted;
the differences in key elements of the programme(s) leading to the qualification in comparison to the programme(s) leading to the relevant qualification of the country in which recognition is sought are too substantial to allow the recognition of the foreign qualification as requested by the applicant. If so, the assessment should seek to establish whether alternative, partial and/or conditional recognition may be granted. The comparability of programme elements should, however, be analysed only with a view to the comparability of outcomes and access to further activities, and not as a necessary condition for recognition in their own right;
competent recognition authorities can document that the differences in the quality of the programme and/or institution at which the qualification was awarded in relation to the quality of the programmes and/or institutions granting the similar qualification in terms of which recognition is sought are too substantial to allow the recognition of the foreign qualification as requested by the applicant. If so, the assessment should seek to establish whether alternative, partial and/or conditional recognition may be granted.